As security concerns intensify across Europe following the escalation of the international armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine in 2022, several states – including Finland, Poland, and the Baltic countries – have moved to withdraw from the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention (APMBC), while similar calls have emerged in other Nordic countries. These developments reflect a growing perception that existing humanitarian disarmament commitments may constrain military effectiveness in a deteriorating security environment. Yet they also raise fundamental questions about the continued relevance of limits in war at a time when they are most needed.

In this post, the Secretaries-General of the Danish, Finnish, Norwegian and Swedish Red Cross Societies argue that withdrawing from the APMBC would not enhance security but risk weakening civilian protection and eroding long-standing humanitarian norms. Drawing on legal, operational and humanitarian considerations, they show that anti-personnel mines remain inherently indiscriminate and of limited military utility, and that their prohibition is fully compatible with modern military cooperation frameworks. They call on Nordic governments to remain committed to the Convention and to uphold clear and universal limits in war, even – and especially – in times of heightened insecurity.

📑 In Case You Missed it

Restoring education after armed conflict: an IHL-guided framework

Education often remains disrupted long after conflict, leaving children without safe access to schools despite legal protections. Explore how stronger compliance with international humanitarian law (IHL) can help safeguard education and enable safer, more inclusive recovery.

When the perpetrator is the climate

Deciding under algorithm: artificial intelligence (AI) and the protection of civilian infrastructure in armed conflict

📣Just Happened

Protecting Missing Persons in Armed Conflict: Engaging Non-State Armed Groups 

At a recent event, ICRC highlighted its new study on how non-state armed groups can prevent family separation, address missing persons cases, and ensure the dignified treatment of the dead in line with IHL. The discussion showcased practical measures and real-world examples drawn from the practices of 64 armed groups worldwide. Missed it? Watch the full event.

💡 In the Spotlight

Was this email forwarded to you?

Subscribe here to receive ICRC's monthly Law & Policy Newsletter.