The risks and inefficacies of AI systems in military targeting support
Over the past decade, discussions surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) in the military domain have largely focused on autonomous weapon systems. This is partially due to the ongoing debates of the Group of Governmental Experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. While autonomous weapon systems are indeed a pressing concern, the critical reality is that AI is hastily deployed to gather intelligence and, even more worrisome, to support militaries to select and engage targets.
As AI-based decision support systems (AI DSS) are increasingly used in contemporary battlefields, Jimena Sofía Viveros Álvarez, member of the United Nations Secretary General’s High-Level Advisory Body on AI, REAIM Commissioner and OECD.AI Expert, advocates against the reliance on these technologies in supporting the target identification, selection and engagement cycle as their risks and inefficacies are a permanent fact which cannot be ignored, for they actually risk exacerbating civilian suffering.
Examine why stakeholders in the ongoing discussion about AI in the military domain should consider the impact of algorithmic bias on AI DSS more seriously.
Delve into some of the challenges and risks, as well as the potential, that pertain to the use of AI DSS in preserving human judgement on the use of force.
Discover a set of legal, policy and operational recommendations to elevate the protection of children from media rallying cry to political priority.
📅 Mark your calendars
This year marks the 75th anniversary of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, a cornerstone moment for reinforcing the role of international humanitarian law (IHL) in conflict resolution. Our upcoming event, "Colombia’s path towards peace: the role of IHL," highlights this milestone. Join us as we explore how the respect of IHL can facilitate a return to peace by reducing the cost of war. Discussions will also extend to how the ICRC, as a neutral intermediary in armed conflict, continues to influence global humanitarian standards.
We are delighted to invite you to share your voice and insights in our upcoming blog series, "Emerging Voices in International Humanitarian Law, Policy, and Action."
This initiative seeks to bring fresh perspectives and innovative solutions to the forefront of humanitarian law and policy discussions. We invite young scholars, new professionals, and passionate voices from traditionally underrepresented regions to contribute their ideas and insights. Contributions should offer novel arguments, challenge conventional approaches, and propose solutions that can influence future debates under IHL.
We welcome submissions in English, Arabic, French, and Spanish. The deadline for submissions is October 31, 2024.
This October, states will convene at the 34th International Conference. The ICRC has launched a new model pledge encouraging them to commit to actions to reduce wartime environmental damage.
Over 80 representatives from states, National Societies, the IFRC, the ICRC, and the International Humanitarian Fact-Finding Commission discussed the resolutions and possible pledges for the 34th International Conference.
A set of minimum but essential standards aimed at ensuring that protection work carried out by human rights and humanitarian actors in armed conflict and other situations of violence is safe and effective.
🔖 Missed any of these?
Revisit the vital role of international humanitarian law and the 75th anniversary of the Geneva Conventions - "The one set of rules we all agree on".
Jointhe ICRC Law & Policy Group on LinkedIn to never miss an update on all things IHL and policy.
For the millions of people in countries reliant on humanitarian assistance, greater support is desperately needed to save lives and avert further suffering. You can help the people you are reading about.